Can scholarly pirate libraries bridge the knowledge access gap? An empirical study on the structural conditions of book piracy in global and European academia

I never knew that they wrote such papers. They appear in Plos and it is worthwhile to read them in the entirety.

From the article:

Library Genesis is one of the oldest and largest illegal scholarly book collections online. Without the authorization of copyright holders, this shadow library hosts and makes more than 2 million scholarly publications, monographs, and textbooks available. This paper analyzes a set of weblogs of one of the Library Genesis mirrors, provided to us by one of the service’s administrators. We reconstruct the social and economic factors that drive the global and European demand for illicit scholarly literature. In particular, we test if lower income regions can compensate for the shortcomings in legal access infrastructures by more intensive use of illicit open resources. We found that while richer regions are the most intensive users of shadow libraries, poorer regions face structural limitations that prevent them from fully capitalizing on freely accessible knowledge. We discuss these findings in the wider context of open access publishing, and point out that open access knowledge, if not met with proper knowledge absorption infrastructures, has limited usefulness in addressing knowledge access and production inequalities.

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

(The legal disclaimer applies— I am only linking to the main article here- this is not intended to benefit me commercially in any manner whatsoever).

This metric is very interesting:

While India is understandable, why are the developed economies featuring in the list?

Beyond the cost, it has to do with the convenience. Just press the DOI and you get the PDF without the hassle of entering passwords.