Telemedicine: Where Telemedicine Falls Short. Perspective from a primary care physician

There has been a rash of write ups on Telemedicine and I did share some thoughts with a well known researcher. Of course, the blog offers a “raw material” for the “world-view” and each idea layers on to others to make it possible. That’s the reason why I consider writing a sacrosanct.

However, it is important to get differing perspectives and this one from a primary care physician.

I also know that well-trained clinicians use all their senses — not just hearing and vision. They appraise the whole patient: Is there a new limp, a shift in posture, a new pallor? Often, it’s what patients don’t notice or complain about that is essential. And there is no diagnostic test more cost-effective than the laying on of hands. I have found treatable cancers multiple times in routine exams that would be impossible to replicate in the virtual world. Could a Zoom visit detect a lymph node too firm, a spleen or liver too large, or an unexpected prostate nodule (with a normal PSA)?

Where Telemedicine Falls Short

Should we push for Telemedicine? I think it would make perfect sense for remote “monitoring” but of course, I have other ideas. We don’t use it for quantitative estimation of effects of therapeutic interventions. That’s the problem which Apple is trying to solve under the garb of consumer electronics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.